The woman is walking on a path of Braille dots. The Braille dots lead to the doors. The computer on the door represents text-to -speach (TTS) and the right side of the door represents the scientific method. Read on to learn what the symbols mean in more depth to me.
Embedded Files
Introduction: Planting Seeds for Equity in Blind Employment
Over the past several years, I have devoted my personal time and professional insight to advocating for systemic change in how blind individuals are hired, educated, and rehabilitated. My journey began with petitioning a school board for the blind to implement a preferential hiring matrix—one that would enable blind professionals to access truly equal employment opportunities. This effort was not just about policy; it was about dismantling long-standing biases and creating space for lived experience to be valued in leadership roles.
I extended my advocacy to the American Council of the Blind, informing them of the structural challenges facing blind education and rehabilitation. My campaign has included a formal petition, dozens of letters to stakeholders, and presenting findings to the Governor’s Committee on Persons with Disabilities. Despite the rigor and reach of these efforts, the system remains rigid and resistant to change. I’ve planted many seeds, but the harvest has been slow and sparse.
This experience has taught me that change—especially attitudinal change—is a long process. It requires interrupting stimulus-response patterns that are often rooted in childhood perceptions of disability. My advocacy is not limited to working-age adults; I believe these reforms can and must extend to blind seniors as well. Fighting for individuals with functional limitations is not just my profession—it’s my passion.
Essay 1: Preferential Hiring as a Pathway to Equity
The concept of preferential hiring is often misunderstood. It is not about lowering standards—it is about recognizing the unique qualifications that blind individuals bring to roles in education, rehabilitation, and social services. When a blind professional applies to work at a school for the blind, their lived experience should be considered an asset, not a liability.
I proposed a hiring matrix that would weigh disability experience alongside traditional credentials. This matrix would allow blind applicants to compete on a level playing field, especially in environments where their insights are directly relevant to the population served. The resistance I encountered was not based on logic, but on entrenched attitudes about blindness and capability.
Essay 2: Informing the American Council of the Blind
My outreach to the American Council of the Blind was driven by a desire to elevate the conversation beyond local school boards. I compiled data, personal testimonies, and policy recommendations to illustrate how blind professionals are routinely excluded from roles they are uniquely qualified to fill.
The Council was receptive, but the challenge remains: how do we translate awareness into action? I urged them to adopt a national stance on preferential hiring and to support legislation that incentivizes inclusive employment practices. The Council’s platform could be a powerful tool for change—if it is used boldly and consistently.
Essay 3: Presenting to the Governor’s Committee
Presenting my findings to the Governor’s Committee on Persons with Disabilities was a pivotal moment. I outlined the barriers blind individuals face in employment, education, and rehabilitation. I emphasized the need for policy reform, not just programmatic tweaks.
The committee acknowledged the validity of my concerns, but systemic inertia is a formidable opponent. I proposed pilot programs, mentorship initiatives, and funding reallocations—all aimed at empowering blind professionals to lead within their own communities. The response was cautious, but not dismissive. It was a step forward.
Essay 4: Lessons in Advocacy and Attitudinal Change
One of the most profound lessons I’ve learned is that advocacy is not just about policy—it’s about psychology. Changing attitudes requires disrupting deeply ingrained stimulus-response patterns. These patterns often begin in childhood, where disability is framed as deficiency rather than diversity.
I’ve seen firsthand how even well-meaning professionals can unconsciously perpetuate exclusion. That’s why my advocacy includes education, storytelling, and direct engagement. I believe that when people hear from blind professionals themselves, their perceptions begin to shift. Slowly, but meaningfully. In the Alice's Wonderland, Alice recognizes how every character is playing a role and part. It's not until Alice realizes that her insight and wisdom is the key to getting out of this illogical world. I'm Alice! And I hope to help others with blindness from being trapped in this oppressive world.
Essay 5: Expanding the Vision to Include Seniors
My advocacy is not limited to working-age adults. Blind seniors face unique challenges in rehabilitation, social inclusion, and access to adaptive technologies. Many of the reforms I’ve proposed—preferential hiring, inclusive education, and attitudinal change—can benefit older adults as well.
I envision a system where blind seniors are not just recipients of care, but contributors to their communities. With the right support, they can mentor younger blind individuals, participate in civic life, and live with dignity and autonomy. This is not just a dream—it’s a goal worth fighting for.
Call for Educational Equity: Transforming the Experience of Blind Students
As a blind individual who has experienced firsthand the challenges and limitations of the current education system for visually impaired students, I implore you to join me in advocating for a transformative chnge. The field of teaching students with visual impairments (TSVI) is plagued by outdated methodologies, lack of empirical research, and a focus on rehabilitation rather than education, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for countless blind children.
My hope is also that you will better understand the issues and join in the effort to advocate for these at-risk children. The prevailing paradigm in TSVI often prioritizes traditional methods like Braille and magnification over emerging technologies like text-to-speech. This approach fails to recognize the potential of these tools to empower blind students and provide them with equitable access to education. Furthermore, the lack of standardized assessments and reliance on subjective measures hinders effective intervention.
The Importance of the Scientific Method
The controversies surrounding the field of TSVI often revolve around the use of the scientific method. Many argue that the lack of empirical research and reliance on anecdotal evidence is a contributing factor to the abysmal outcomes of blind students. For example, the assumption that students who are blind are not passing state assessments due to multiple disabilities is a common misconception.Yet, IDEA requires the use of scientifically validated methods and strategies for teaching. Standardization has occurred in the field of TVI without necessary evidence to support clinically significant outcomes based on valid measures.
Literacy Redefined: Beyond Braille and Magnification
Literacy is not solely defined by the ability to access information through one's fingers or eyes. It's about maximizing access to information through all available senses. While Braille and magnification have their place, text-to-speech technology offers a powerful alternative that can significantly enhance literacy for blind students.
Students who read Braille, on average, read approximately 55 words per minute and according to the Foundation Book on Blindness, by Holbrok and the Texas School for individuals who are blind, the reading rate of people who are blind with unfamiliar text is an assumption.
The field of TSVI does not have standards for rate of growth for braille. To help demonstrate a reading speed of 55 words per minute, I encourage you to click on settings on your computer and scroll down to visual accessibility. There you can set the reading rate of a text to speech button to 55 words per minute. This speed is what it is assumed that a student who has had some years of Braille experience will be able to read. And listen to something unfamiliar. I have not seen data as to whether this speed can be maintained on a state assessment.
To maximize the information a blind student can truly gain from written text; the student must have access to text-to-speech paired with either Braille or large print. From firsthand experience, I can say with certainty that most widely used text-to-speech software does an excellent job of articulating multisyllable words. Also, I have learned through experience that a text-to-speech user needs to identify a suitable electronic voice profile as early as possible and stick with it. I have learned that learning to learn through your ears is a process, not an event. The current model is a wait to fail. Many programs in Special Education and TSVI do not require that teachers learn even the operational basics of text-to-speech software.
I do not know if studies have been done on this topic, but I am certain that the results will support including text-to-speech in the acquisition of written information for a blind student. The prevailing paradigm in TSVI often prioritizes traditional methods, such as Braille and magnification, over emerging technologies like text-to-speech. This approach fails to recognize the potential of these tools to empower blind students and provide them with equitable access to education. Furthermore, the lack of standardized assessments and a reliance on subjective measures hinders accurate and effective intervention.
Concerns about assessment tools.
Two assessments are currently being used in the field of visual impairment. One assessment is called the Functional Vision Assessment (FVA), and the other is called the Learning Media Assessment (LMA). Both tools are being used in eligibility determination decisions. These are informal measures being couched as formal ones. The FVA requires teachers of students with visual impairments to gather a variety of different materials, to create a “kit” to evaluate a child’s functional vision. For example, a child’s contrast sensitivity, acuity, and field of vision. Throughout my graduate studies, I was taught that assessments with less than a .80 correlation coefficient should not be used in supporting an eligibility determination for Special Education and related services. I am sure that these measures produce both false positives and false negatives. The TSVI is required to take only one course in eye anatomy. In some cases, that course is taken in a six-week time interval.
I know that if the TVI teacher was blinded to the eye medical report that the results of their assessment would not match that of an eye doctor with an incredible amount of knowledge and skill. I think the school nurse would likely have a more reliable report.
The Learning Media assessment (LMA) is supposed to identify the way the child can best learn through their senses. I have been able to find nothing in the Mental Measurement Yearbook on either of these assessments, yet these measures are being used to identify and evaluate services for students who are blind. When your assessments are unreliable and invalid, well everything else in on shaky ground, right? Furthermore, Teachers of the blind and visually impaired do not have additional course work in assessment, such as school psychology or educational diagnostics. These informal assessments are being used to guide the instruction and education of the blind. A student may be misidentified as having a primary mode of learning through their eyes. Thus, instruction is built with the findings of these measures. Vision is inherently unreliable for many eye disorders/injuries. And testing reading comprehension with either just braille or eyeballs will yield inaccurate results of what the student can do.
The expanded core curriculum (ECC), a standardized curriculum for blind students, has been adopted without sufficient research or evaluation. This curriculum, while intended to address the unique needs of visually impaired students, often leads to unnecessary assessments and interventions that can be detrimental to their overall education. In 2014, TSVI programs endorsed and lobbied for passage of legislation mandating the Expanded Core Curriculum (ECC). The expanded core was adopted and subsequently endorsed despite having not undergone a systematic review or meta-analysis. With scant research, the then Superintendent of the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired (TSBVI) travelled from state-to-state convincing folks in the field to get the Federal government to standardize this curriculum. In doing so, they infused rehabilitation education into childhood education. The expanded core is a curriculum that assesses students functioning in the following areas: compensatory access, sensory efficiency, Orientation and Mobility (O&M), social skills, career development, assistive technology, recreation and leisure, and independent living. While some areas of the expanded core are necessary for a blind student to access learning and extracurricular activities, other areas of the curriculum should require parental consent. For instance, according to the ECC, a 16-year-old child with many friends, diagnosed with an eye disorder is automatically believed to have social problems that require mandatory evaluation. Indeed, the TVI applying the intervention, does not likely have an Applied Behavior Analysis certification, and the General Education teachers have not seen any indication that the blind student needs evaluation. IN other words, a problem was never reported, but assumptions were made. While intended to address the unique needs of visually impaired students, the ECC often leads to unnecessary assessments and interventions that can be detrimental to their overall education. Again, the parent has little input into the programing of their child who is blind. Yet, the parents of these children pay taxes and folks far away are making important decisions.
In the case of career development, a TSVI may have read one chapter in a foundation book on assessment and intervention. The TSVI is likely misinterpreting and misdirecting students based on limited knowledge and skills. The TSVI has not likely had sufficient training to be competent in vocational rehabilitation or the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as their entire college programs dedicated to those two specialties. It appears that the teacher of students with visual impairments has a lot of latitude and discretion regarding when and how often to evaluate and intervene on the expanded core. This matter is important because so few of the children who are blind are meeting state standards on the state assessments. Taking a child out of his or her class to undergo this barrage of assessments can be extremely detrimental for students.
The American Foundation for the Blind publishes the Journal of Visual Impairment .When I asked them what is required for a study to be published, they simply said that articles that appear in the journal are peer reviewed. So, the Journal of Visual Impairment does not require that a study have basic components of the scientific method, like an independent variable named and listed. Many states in the country do not have a TSVI training program. The faculty who works in this field likely know each other well. Texas is one of the few states that have two TVI programs. My research has revealed that faculty often work at both institutions at the same time, because both programs are offered exclusively online. When you have a small group of “specialists”, adhering to the scientific method is incredibly difficult or even impossible. The faculty likely go to the same conferences, bars, and are probably aware of each other’s projects and writing style. Reading an article from the Journal of Visual Impairment is not much different from reading an article out of the New York Times. These instructors all know each other well, I am sure. The town of TVI is smaller I am sure than any field in education.
. Students who read print are likely performing worse. The Foundations for visual Impairment and Blindness textbook says that to adapt a child’s environment more than necessary separates the child from his environment. They state that the least restrictive adaptation is the one that most closely resembles the strategies used by other students without visual impairment. The schools for the blind endorse this model, which is why nearly all the schools for the blind are labeled as “low tech”. So, efficient is not the model used.
No one that I have observed is conducting systematic observations to evaluate the frequency and duration that blind students have to the general education instruction, materials, and learning management systems. Are the students getting partial or full access?
I pray that students are not being misidentified as having additional disabilities because of failure to systematically account for student access. Someone outside of the teacher’s field of TVI should be undertaking these types of studies.
What is my hope for the education of blind students?
We need to move from excluding text-to-speech software and technology to a full emersion into this medium. Students are not going to have equal access to the general education curriculum utilizing the model used in most states. Utah‘s satellite campus system is the best model I have been made aware of, with the exception that technology is not utilized for learning. Utah sets up one campus in each of several major cities for blind students to come and receive immersion /access to tools and strategies. Furthermore, students can remain with their families while early intervention occurs. Content can be taught in an accessible way to children who are blind. The model is designed for children who are blind, versus trying to adapt pieces of it.
The foundations of teaching students who are blind textbooks are fraught with outdated citations, lack of empirical research, and a problem focus orientation. Very few of the schools for the blind have blind educators such as me to serve as role models to their students. Apparently, they believe that difference is wrong and doing things differently is wrong. According to their own model, try to do everything the way a child with normal vision does it as opposed to being efficient.
I need your help to turn the TVI program around from indoctrination of pseudoscience to one of critical thinkers who adopt the scientific method. Children who are blind deserve the attention of the brilliant minds of psychologists and professors with quantitative minds. If specializations mean that everyone goes to their separate islands, then bad things will happen. I ask rehab psychologists, special educators, and all your students, to please consider investigating the topics that I am bringing up here. I am certain that there is a multitude of master’s Theses and Dissertations waiting to be written.
It is imperative that we move away from these outdated practices and adopt a more evidence-based and inclusive approach. We need to:
Prioritize technology: Embrace emerging technologies, such as text-to-speech and assistive technology, to ensure equal access to education.
Conduct rigorous research: Invest in research to develop evidence-based practices and inform educational decisions.
Re-evaluate the expanded core and make decisions about allowing for student and parental consent for alternate educational assessment/interventions.
Foster collaboration: Encourage collaboration between educators, researchers, and advocates to develop innovative solutions.
Call to Action:
By working together, we can create a more inclusive and equitable education system that empowers blind students to reach their full potential. The current system, if left unchanged, will continue to produce negative outcomes. Let us encourage a problem-solving approach through research and advocacy to create a brighter future for visually impaired students.
Note: Children are being encouraged to use the Perkins. My Mother is a nurse and indicated that young children with growing hands would not be a good idea to be pressing hard on something like a perkins at a young age. I know of persons who engaged in these behaviors very young who didn't even reach the age of 40 before being diagnosed with severe carpal tunnel to the point where going to the bathroom (moving wrist and hands) was impossible. I ask that the ACB reach out to medical professionals for the time in which a perkins might be safe to use.
Thank you & God bless. Happy Easter.
Through the Shattered Prism of Opportunity: A Plea from the Blind Community
A blind Alice, fingertips tracing the jagged fractures of a frost-covered windowpane, strains to perceive the vibrant world of opportunity beyond, only to confront a grotesque distortion. We, blind clients and educated adults, find ourselves trapped in this disorienting tableau, where vocational rehabilitation, once a beacon of hope, has devolved into a twisted Wonderland. Logic contorts, dreams dissolve like mist, and we press against the cold, unyielding glass, seeking clarity, only to find a desolate landscape of misunderstanding and impenetrable barriers, our skills rendered invisible, our potential a phantom whisper.
Imagine a blind Alice, her journey to employment lost in a suffocating labyrinth of fog, where paths vanish and promises fade, the view through the window utterly obscured. The White Rabbit of rehabilitation, his pocket watch ticking towards illusory futures, now scurries down narrow, predetermined corridors glimpsed through a sliver of clouded glass, his shrill mantra echoing: "Tech alone, dear Alice, tech alone!" A virtuoso musician, yearning to share their gift, is forcibly thrust towards coding, their melodies silenced by the Mad Hatter's arbitrary decrees, their potential locked behind the frosty pane. A gifted writer, dreaming of weaving narratives for the world, is relegated to the sterile realm of data entry, their stories suppressed, their voice extinguished by a system blind to their brilliance, their stories lost in the opaque depths of the window. The Mad Hatter's career counsel, a chaotic tea party of misdirection, disregards the vibrant symphony of our talents, the rich tapestry of our lives unseen, unheard, and unvalued.
The Queen's decree, "Begin at the end!" has been ruthlessly overturned. Our counselors, once revered as sagacious guides, now wander aimlessly, dispensing nonsensical riddles from the Cheshire Cat's repertoire, their guidance as fragmented and blurred as the view through the shattered prism of the window. They are incapable of distinguishing a competent vendor from a Dormouse peddling illusions, their judgment as clouded as the frosted glass. Fundamental skills, the bedrock of accessibility – touch typing, advanced JAWS navigation – are dismissed as trivial, their importance erased from the distorted view. A blind Alice, seeking to navigate the intricate labyrinth of complex web forms with Fusion, is offered only rudimentary computer training, a useless croquet mallet in a digital realm teeming with complexity, her path forward choked by the window's distortions.
The most egregious betrayal lies in the vanishing of the proactive counselor, the guiding light who once illuminated pathways to meaningful employment, offering a clear view through the window. Historically, these mentors, akin to the wise Caterpillar dispensing invaluable advice, would proactively engage with employers, entering their workplaces before a single application was sent. They would dismantle negative attitudes and misconceptions, demonstrating assistive technologies and explaining how to cultivate accessible workplaces. They would clear the fog from the window, showcasing the capabilities and potential of blind individuals. They would demonstrate assistive technologies, articulate the importance of accommodations, and equip clients with the necessary tools, painting a vision of possibility through the once-frosted glass.
Now, that bridge is shattered into a thousand shards, leaving only an echoing void, the view through the window completely blocked. The White Rabbit of advocacy has vanished without a trace, lost in a labyrinth of bureaucratic paperwork, leaving the window a solid, opaque barrier. Blind Alice is forced to navigate the treacherous terrain of job applications alone, confronting the monstrous Jabberwocky of ingrained biases and archaic misconceptions, her path obscured by the impenetrable fog. Employers, trapped in their own bizarre Wonderland of ignorance, inquire, "Can you even receive emails?" instead of focusing on the client's qualifications and capabilities, their view of the world through the distorted prism of the window. They remain willfully ignorant of their ADA obligations, dismissing legal mandates as mere riddles, their understanding of the law as clouded as the frosted glass. "Accommodation?" they ponder, scratching their heads like Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, "What fantastical creature is this?" The concept of reasonable adjustments is as foreign to them as a flamingo used as a croquet mallet, their vision of accessibility shattered, their view blocked.
As a fragile glimmer of hope flickers through the oppressive fog, a faint light visible through a tiny, clear crack in the window, the EAS specialist, a jittery White Rabbit perpetually on the verge of panic, whispers, "Private employers, they'll never do. Their systems, based on prior… catastrophes, will prove utterly inaccessible. Blind Alices, repeatedly dismissed, fired, lost in the labyrinth of their digital mazes," their warnings further clouding the window. The prism darkens, private employment obscured by a dense fog of perceived inevitability, fueled by past failures rather than present possibilities, the view completely blocked. When discrimination inevitably rears its ugly head, the Queen's decree echoes with chilling finality: "It's the employer's burden!" The agency, like a deck of cards scattered by a tempest, shirks all responsibility, the window shuttered, the light extinguished. A talking calculator, a fundamental tool for independence, is denied, the burden placed squarely on the employer's shoulders, the tools to see a clear path removed. The EAS specialist, like the perpetually confused twins, amplifies employer anxiety, their lack of knowledge about accessibility creating a self-fulfilling prophecy of exclusion, their misinformation further distorting the reflection in the window.
Even before employers have a chance to assess a candidate, the EAS specialist, a nervous Knave of Hearts, warns, "Private systems, they're… peculiar. Inevitably, inaccessible," their words further frosting the window, turning it into an opaque barrier. They conjure images of insurmountable technical barriers, effectively discouraging employers from exploring potential solutions and fostering a culture of exclusion, the window completely iced over, the view lost. They remain woefully ignorant of standard operating systems and the daily computer use of blind individuals, their understanding of the world outside the window completely wrong.
Furthermore, the very data that should illuminate our path to success is deliberately obscured, leaving us shooting in the dark. The Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) must be compelled to publish transparent employment outcome data, categorized by specific professions such as skilled trades and social work (akin to Gallaudet University's transparency), to provide clear insights for the public and stakeholders. This lack of clear, accessible data leaves us groping in the dark, unable to assess the effectiveness of the services we receive. This opacity extends to other state-run facilities like the Health and Human Services (HHS) and the School for the Blind. They, too, refuse to provide clear, categorized outcome data, leaving us blind to the true results of their efforts. This deliberate lack of transparency further clouds the window, preventing us from seeing the true state of employment opportunities. Moreover, the state must mandate that all state institutions publicly disclose the number of individuals with disabilities they employ, showcasing their commitment to inclusivity and setting a powerful example for private employers. We are data points, collected and analyzed, yet the outcomes remain shrouded in secrecy, accessible to few.
The emotional toll is devastating. Imagine a blind Alice, her dreams withering like flowers in a barren wasteland, her independence systematically undermined, her confidence shattered, her view of the future completely blocked, the window a barrier of despair.
We demand a return to the principles of proactive rehabilitation, a clearing of the fog from the shattered prism of opportunity. We seek knowledgeable guides, not passive bystanders, guides who will mend the fractured glass and clear the view. We demand a system where opportunity flourishes, not withers and dies, a clear path through the window. We seek passionate advocates, not indifferent observers, guides who will shatter the barrier and open the window. Let us shatter the shattered prism, restore the magic of possibility, and secure every blind Alice's "happily ever after," a clear, unobstructed view of their future.
To the Esteemed Department of Education,,
I write to you today with a humble, albeit sarcastic, proposal regarding the education of blind children. It has come to my attention that we, as educators and specialists, possess such profound wisdom that we can confidently dictate what is best for these children, regardless of pesky parental input or, dare I say, actual evidence.
First, let us dispense with the antiquated notion that reading, writing, and arithmetic are essential skills. Clearly, culinary arts reign supreme! After all, a blind child is destined for unemployment and poverty, thus requiring exceptional cooking skills. Meanwhile, sighted children instinctively master gourmet cuisine (my own nephew’s mac and cheese prowess is a testament to this innate ability – please disregard any standardized assessments in this area).After all, my nephew was assessed for his cooking skills in high school , despite refusing to take home economics at my insistance. His Mom thought band was more important.
Secondly, the expertise of schools for the blind in defining "target behaviors" is truly awe-inspiring. Who needs input from parents or local school districts when we, the subject matter experts, can utilize our "informal measures" (disguised as formal ones, naturally) to determine what these children need to know? And the self-congratulatory back-patting that ensues when we demonstrate "improvement" using self-referenced measures is a truly sublime experience. The fact that we operate in a vacuum, blissfully unaware of what their sighted peers can achieve in the Expanded Core Curriculum, is merely a minor detail.
Thirdly, the ubiquitous "social skills" deficit among blind children is a fascinating phenomenon. Our unwavering adherence to the medical model conveniently absolves society of any responsibility for attitudinal barriers. Instead, we confidently attribute any social challenges to individual competence or performance differences. And the TVIs, bless their hearts, are armed with an arsenal of "formal measures" (because, as we all know, they are the foremost experts on such things) to justify endless interventions.
On the subject of TVIs, their superior medical expertise is truly remarkable. Who needs a school nurse for vision checks when a TVI, armed with a six-week course, can reliably assess a child's vision? Clearly, their training surpasses that of any registered nurse.
The Expanded Core Curriculum, with its illusion of individualization, is another stroke of genius. And let us not concern ourselves with such trivialities as "independent variables," "randomized controlled trials," or the "Mental Measurement Yearbook." My own instructor’s bewildered response to the mere mention of the latter speaks volumes.
Finally, while parents of sighted children can influence curriculum choices at their local school board (regardless of whether these choices are evidence-based or not), parents of blind children are conveniently silenced. After all, the Department of Education's mandate to employ unqualified teachers to assess areas outside a TVI's scope of competence (career development, social skills, recreation, leisure, and formal measures) is paramount. And the reliance on Learning Media assessments to predict learning styles, despite the potential for monumental harm, is simply beyond reproach.
Therefore, I implore the Department of Education to consider these modest proposals. By embracing this satirical approach, we can ensure the continued, albeit misguided, "expertise" that currently shapes the education of blind children.
Sincerely (and with a heavy dose of sarcasm),
Introduction : Beyond the Looking Glass of Traditional Methods
Imagine Alice, exploring Wonderland with its whimsical chaos. Now, envision her twin sister, Marsha, entering a different kind of Wonderland – a world where access and equity are not fantastical dreams but tangible realities. Marsha, functionally blind, embarks on a journey where the "logic" of her Wonderland is built upon the foundation of cutting-edge assistive technology, not outdated limitations.
The current landscape of blind education often confines children to methods that, while well-intentioned, inherently restrict their potential. Braille and magnification, while valuable tools, are frequently positioned as the primary means of access, resulting in a significant disparity in pace and comprehension compared to their sighted peers. This proposal advocates for a paradigm shift, placing robust screen-reading technology at the forefront, ensuring blind children like Marsha are equipped to thrive in a digital world.
Marsha's Wonderland: A Model for Equitable Education
In Marsha's Wonderland, the curious rabbit leads her not to a tea party, but to a powerful suite of assistive technology:
Immersive Screen-Reading Technology: Marsha is immediately introduced to and proficiently trained in using advanced screen-reading software like JAWS/Fusion and VoiceOver on all her devices. This ensures seamless access to digital content, mirroring the experience of her sighted peers.
Multimodal Learning Approach: While screen reading is the primary tool, Braille and magnification are recognized as valuable supplementary resources for specific tasks and personal preferences. However, the only way a child can reach grade level expectations is with screen readers.
Redefining Reading Comprehension: In Marsha's Wonderland, reading comprehension is not defined by visual recognition of letters and words. Instead, it is measured by the child's ability to extract meaning, synthesize information, and engage with the text. The focus shifts from "seeing" to "understanding," recognizing that the purpose of reading is to convey ideas, not to demonstrate visual acuity.
Expeditious Access and Fluency: The goal is to provide Marsha with the most efficient means of accessing and processing information. This means prioritizing screen-reading technology that allows her to keep pace with grade-level expectations, eliminating the inherent delays associated with traditional methods.
The Logic of Marsha's Wonderland: A Foundation for Success
Challenging the Status Quo: The assertion that Braille or magnification alone can bring a blind child to grade-level parity is fundamentally flawed. These methods are inherently slower and less efficient than screen-reading technology in a digital age.
Prioritizing Digital Literacy: In today's world, digital literacy is essential for academic and professional success. By prioritizing screen-reading technology, we empower blind children to become confident and proficient users of digital tools, opening doors to a wider range of opportunities.
Individualized Learning and Data-Driven Decisions: While screen reading is the default, the proposal advocates for a data-driven approach. When it comes to math, the child's preference and performance data should guide the choice between Nemeth Code and magnification. We should not assume one is better than the other without data.
Emphasizing Production and Creation: Screen-reading technology is not just for consumption; it is also a powerful tool for creation. Children should be encouraged to use these tools to write, research, and express themselves, fostering a sense of agency and empowerment.
Addressing the Math Challenge
The dilemma of math education for blind children is acknowledged. Traditional methods, whether Nemeth Code or magnification, often present challenges in terms of speed and efficiency. The proposal advocates for:
Flexibility and Individualization: Recognizing that there is no one-size-fits-all solution, the choice of math tools should be driven by the child's individual needs and preferences.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Regular assessments and data collection should be used to determine which method, Nemeth Code or magnification, allows the child to achieve the best results.
Exploration of Emerging Technologies: The field of assistive technology is constantly evolving. We should remain open to exploring and integrating new tools and methods that may enhance math education for blind children.
Call to Action: Building Marsha's Wonderland
This proposal is a call to action to transform the landscape of blind education. By embracing the "logic" of Marsha's Wonderland, we can:
Empower blind children to reach their full potential.
Ensure equitable access to education and opportunities.
Foster a generation of confident and capable individuals who can thrive in a digital world.
In essence, readily available commercial screen-reading technology offers the only viable pathway to bridge the access gap between blind and sighted children, providing a level of comprehensive engagement with digital and printed materials that partial solutions simply cannot achieve. We must abandon the fallacy of 'low-tech' versus 'high-tech' – these are not arbitrary labels, but indicators of functional access. The benchmark is not 'normality,' but equity and achievement. Therefore, we must reject the outdated and detrimental 'wait-to-fail' model. Instead, we must immediately equip blind children with the tools that offer a genuine chance to meet and exceed academic standards: powerful screen-reading software like JAWS or Fusion. Efficiency, fluency, and full access are not luxuries; they are fundamental rights in a digital age.
Let us move beyond the limitations of traditional methods and create a Wonderland where all children, regardless of their visual abilities, can achieve their dreams
The This is just a sam ple of what I had readily available to insert here. The next draft I am working on is a review of the systematic reviews. So, I hope to share more progress on the change front in future communication.
Google Sites
Report abuse